MONTHLY
REPORT
F.No.
VAL/TECH/82/2004
Mumbai, 20th August 2004.
To
All
Chief Commissioners of Customs
All
Commissioners of Customs
Sir,
Sub: Monitoring of valuation trends in respect of sensitive
commodities.
Kindly refer to DO letter F. No.
467/81/2004-Cus V dated 11th August 2004 from the Member (Customs)
concerning effective coordination between the Directorate of Valuation and
Custom houses in the monitoring of valuation of important and sensitive
commodities.
2.
The Directorate General
of Valuation has been disseminating the valuation related information available
to it in the forms of weekly dispatches of National Import Data Base (NIDB),
the monthly publication of Valuation Bulletin, commodity study reports,
valuation alerts and guidelines. The DOV website (www.dov.gov.in) has been redesigned recently
to provide a lot of additional information, including a weekly release of
Valuation News concerning international price movement of important
commodities. The Directorate has also been providing specific information and
assistance to various Customs stations upon references received. Several workshops were also organized by the
Directorate at major Customs stations during last year to address the problem
areas concerning valuation. However, there has been no regular system of
communication between the Directorate and the Custom Houses.
3.
In this regard, your
kind attention is invited to Board’s instructions contained in letters dated 21st
May 2002 and 25th September 2001 regarding creation of a Valuation
Checking Cell (VCC) or Special Valuation Cell (SVC) in each Custom House for
monitoring the Customs valuation work and to coordinate valuation issues with
the Directorate of Valuation. However,
the Directorate has not been receiving any regular feedback from the Customs
stations with regard to the follow up action on the various information being
provided or on issues, which are of concern and to be examined by DOV. It would be appreciated if the SVC in your
Custom House / Commissionerate is strengthened to: (i) monitor valuation trends
in respect of sensitive commodities
(ii) review the NIDB outliers pertaining to the respective Commissionerates and
take follow up action and (iii) identify problem areas in valuation which
should be referred to the Directorate of Valuation. A monthly report on the above issues may be sent to the
Directorate.
4.
A format has been
designed for sending monthly reports to the DOV by the respective
commissioners, and the same is enclosed.
It is in three Parts. The first two parts (A &B) deal with addition
and deletion to the list of sensitive commodities (reflected in the weekly
dispatch of DVS files of NIDB). The third part deals with the follow up action
on “outliers” marked in the weekly-analyzed data files. It would be appreciated
if the monthly reports were sent to the Directorate by the first week of the
following month. The reports may be
prepared in MS Excel format. Apart from
sending a hard copy, a soft copy of the reports may please be sent as email
attachment to reports@dov.gov.in
Yours faithfully
N. SASIDHARAN
COMMISSIONER (VALUATION)
Encl.: - Proforma.
Copy to:
1.
Director General
(Revenue Intelligence), New Delhi.
2.
Joint Secretary
(Customs), CBEC, New Delhi.
3.
All Commissioners of
Customs and Central Excise.
D.O. Val/Tech/82/2004
Mumbai, 23rd August 2004.
Dear Shri
Kindly refer to your D.O. letter F.No.
467/81/2004-Cus. V dated 11th August 2004 concerning the effective
coordination between the Directorate of Valuation and Custom hoses in the
monitoring of valuation of important and sensitive commodities.
2. The Directorate General of Valuation
has been disseminating the valuation related information available to it in the
forms of weekly dispatches of National Import Data Base (NIDB), the monthly
publication of Valuation Bulletin, commodity study reports, valuation alerts
and guidelines. The DOV website (www.dov.gov.in)
has been redesigned recently to provide a lot of additional information,
including a weekly release of Valuation News concerning international price
movement of important commodities. The Directorate has also been providing
specific information and assistance to various Customs stations upon references
received. Several workshops were also
organized by the Directorate at major Customs stations during last year to
address the problem areas concerning valuation.
3. Upon receiving the above referenced
letter, the Directorate has written to all Chief Commissioners requesting to
strengthen the Special Valuation Cells in each Customhouse so as to monitor the
valuation trends in respect of sensitive commodities and send a monthly report
to the Directorate in a specially designed format. A copy of the letter issued by the Directorate is enclosed.
4. Chief Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai
Zone I took a meeting of the officers in the Directorate of Valuation and the
senior officers in the Mumbai Customs, Zone I on 17th August
2004. The meeting identified certain
important areas for effective coordination between the Customhouse and
Directorate of Valuation. These include
identification of sensitive commodities prone to under valuation, improvement
in the quality of import data captured for the purpose of NIDB, uploading of Directorate
of Valuation data, weekly valuation news and other valuation information
available on the Directorate of Valuation website onto the local area network
(LAN) of the Custom house for easy access by the assessing officers. It was also decided that the officers of the
Custom House and the Directorate of Valuation should meet regularly once a
month to discuss and resolve practical problems in valuation.
5. The Directorate of Valuation has also
strengthened its mechanism to monitor the valuation trends in respect of
sensitive commodities. Taking into
account the monthly feedback received from Commissioners, appropriate and
timely follow up action will be taken to check under valuation of imported
goods.
With
Yours sincerely,
N. SASIDHARAN
COMMISIONER (VALUATION)
Encl.:
- As above.
Custom
Station :
Report
for the month of :
|
Sr. No |
CTH (eight digits) |
Description |
Brand |
Model/Grade/ Specifications |
Reason for inclusion in the
sensitive list |
Whether price sensitive to
Country Of Origin |
Total No. of consignments During the last three
months (specify period |
Total Qty. imported during
the last three months (specify period) |
Total value of imports
specified at column 9 (last three months) |
Details of valuation frauds
detected or investigated, if any |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annexure B
(See weekly DVS files
dispatched by DOV and available on website www.dov.gov.in)
|
Sr. No. |
CTH (eight digits) |
Description |
Specify brand / model /
specifications |
Reason for recommending
deletion from sensitive list |
Quantity imported for the
last three months (specify period) |
Value of imports for the
last three months (specify period) |
Details of valuation frauds
detected or investigated, if any |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annexure C
|
Sr. No. |
Number of outliers reported
by DOV for the month |
Total Differential Revenue
involved for all outliers (Column 2) |
Additional Revenue realized
on account of re-determination of value (Column 3) |
Number of Outliers on which
no action has been taken, i.e no change in declared value effected |
Remarks |
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In respect of Column No. 5, please furnish details in
the following tabular format:
|
Sr. No. |
Bill of Entry Number |
BE Date |
CTH |
Description |
Assessed Value |
Unit Declared Value (unit) |
Weekly weighted Average
value (Unit) |
Differential revenue
Involved |
Reasons for not taking any
action |
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
(9) |
(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
1.
All reports should be
prepared in MS Excel Format
2.
Soft copy of the report
should be sent as an email attachment to directorate.valuation@dov.gov.in
F.No. VAL/TECH/89/2004
Mumbai, 3rd September 2004.
To
All Chief Commissioners of
Customs
All Chief Commissioners of
Customs & Central Excise
Sir,
Sub: Evaluation of the
utility of information and guidelines provided by Directorate of Valuation.
The Directorate of Valuation has
been providing a lot of information in the form of Valuation Bulletin,
Valuation news, Commodity study reports, Valuation guidelines and alerts in
order to assist the Customs stations in the appropriate valuation of imported
goods and to prevent under-valuation. The National Import Database (NIDB),
introduced two years ago, has been providing valuation related information on
contemporaneous imports as well the analyzed data (outliers) concerning
potentially undervalued goods and international price information. The
Directorate has also conducted several Workshops and Seminars to discuss and
resolve valuation questions. A lot of
other valuation related information is provided by the Directorate on its
website (www.dov.gov.in) for direct
access by the field officers.
2. We believe that the activities of the Valuation Directorate
have brought about a quality change in the Customs Valuation work at the field.
However, it has not been possible to evaluate the contribution by the
Directorate in quantitative terms. The Directorate has been receiving monthly
reports concerning the additional revenue realized on account of revision of
declared values. However, it is not
clearly distinguishable as to what extent the additional revenue realized is on
account of the information and guidelines provided by the Directorate of
Valuation. It would be appreciated if the additional revenue realized on account
of application of the NIDB and other information provided by the Directorate is
separately indicated in the monthly report of additional revenue realized.
3. I would also request you to carry out a survey among the
officers under your charge regarding the utility of Data and Information
provided by the Directorate of Valuation in the enclosed proforma and forward
the survey report to us along with your comments and suggestions as early as
possible.
Yours faithfully,
(S. S. RENJHEN)
DIRECTOR GENERAL
Encl.:
Proforma.
PROFORMA FOR VALUTAION INSPECTION
Part (A) General
Information
1. Name of the Custom House / Customs Station and Code :
2. Commissioner in charge :
Name
and Address:
3. Supervisory officer (Addl. / Jt. Commissioner) in charge :
of
import assessment
Name
and Address:
4. NIDB
liaison officer / Supervisory officer in charge of :
Valuation Checking Cell (VCC)
(Boards
letter F. No. 27/2002-Cus-V dated 21.05.2002)
5. Composition of VCC :
6. Previous
dates of Valuation inspection, if any, :
(attach
copy of the Inspection Report)
Part (B) Commodity
information
1. No. of
import documents (Bills of Entry) handled during
the
last 3 years (April – March):
2. Customs
Revenue for the last 3 years (April – March):
3. Major
commodities imported for the last 3 years (April – March):
|
Sr. No. |
Commodity description |
Classification (CTH) |
No. of Bills of Entry per
year (Approx.) |
Average revenue per year |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
|
|
4.
Commodities on which under valuation was
noticed for the
last one year (specify period) :
|
Sr. No |
Commodity (description) |
Classification (CTH) |
No. of Bills of Entry per
year |
No. of cases of under
valuation |
Additional Revenue
realized
|
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Major commodities which have been
identified as sensitive to
undervaluation :
|
Sr. No. |
Description |
Classification (CTH) |
Rate of Duty |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
|
6. Major
importers who have been subjected to
misdeclaration or
undervaluation investigation during the
last three years (April – March):
|
Sr. No. |
Name and Address |
Commodity usually imported |
Suppliers’ Name and Address |
Country of origin |
Port of Shipment |
|
(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part ( C ) NIDB related information
1.
No. of Bills of Entry
filed during the last one year (Period________)
(a) EDI Mode :
(b) Manual Mode :
2.
How is the import data
entry carried out :
(a) EDI
Mode (by Custom House, importer/CHA, service provider) :
(b)
Manual Mode (by Custom House, importer/CHA, service provider) :
3.
How is the import data
extracted and sent to DOV for NIDB analysis:
(i)
Automatic or Manual system :
(ii) Frequency of data dispatches :
(iii) Mode
of data transmission (ICENET / E.MAIL) :
4.
Receipt of NIDB weekly
analyzed data from DOV:
(i)
Regular or not:
(ii)
How is data stored
(NIDB-Q or NIDB-C):
(iii)
How the data is
distributed to staff (LAN, Stand alone PCs):
(iv)
No. of data access
terminals provided :
(v)
Is the data access by
individual officers monitored and, if so, how:
5.
NIDB outliers :
(i)
No. of NIDB outliers
indicated for the last one year (specify period):
(ii)
No. of cases in which
follow up action was taken:
(iii)
Percentage of cases
where under valuation was detected:
Sample files may be kept
ready for inspection.
6.
NIDB data quality :
(i)
Information columns
provided are adequate or not::
(please
explain the inadequacy, if any)
(ii)
Description (complete or
not):
(iii)
Specification (Brand,
Model, Grade etc.) adequate or not:
(iv)
Suggestion for
improvement, if any:
7.
Purpose for which NIDB
is used :
(i)
Comparison of declared
values in live assessment:
(ii)
Valuation under Rules 5,
6 & 8 :
(iii)
Investigation on Customs
offences :
(iv)
Other (Pl. specify) :
Sample files on all
categories may be kept ready for inspection.
Part (D) Valuation
Administration
1.
Files on issue of
Appealable orders pertaining to cases where declared values have been rejected
on account of valuation fraud or suspected cases handled under Rule 10A of
Customs Valuation Rules 1988 may be kept ready for inspection.
2.
Provide information on
cases (number for the last three years) where Bill of Entry declaration was
found with some discrepancy having influenced the declared value on account of
the following:
(i)
Country of origin :
(ii)
Relationship / transfer
pricing :
(iii)
Classification :
(iv)
Conditions /
Restriction attached with the sale :
(v)
Additional payments
(Royalties, Licence Fees etc.):
(vi)
Assists supplied by the
importer (buyer) :
Files pertaining to all the above cases may kept ready
for inspection.
3.
List of Court Cases
against appealable orders pertaining to cases where declared value of imported
goods has been rejected under Rule 10A of Customs Valuation Rules 1988. The files may be kept ready for inspection.
4.
Details of Standing
orders in force on valuation matters (copies to be enclosed).
5.
Responsibilities
assigned to Valuation Checking Cell (copy of office order to be enclosed).
6.
Suggestions for
strengthening or improving valuation administration at National level.