FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
(FAQ)
|
What are the different methods of customs valuation
allowed under the ACV? |
|
[ Section I ] [ Section II ] [ Section III ] [ Section IV ] [ Section V ] [ Section VI ] [ Section VII ] [ Section VIII ] [ Section IX ] [ Section X ]
Ans: Article VII of the GATT, 1994 lays
down the main principles of customs valuation. Customs value should not be
arbitrary, fictitious or based on value of indigenous goods. It should be real
and based on the actual value of goods under import or of like goods. It should
also derive from a sale or offer of sale in the ordinary course of business
under fully competitive conditions. If the actual value is not ascertainable,
the customs value should be based on the nearest ascertainable equivalent of
such value. The ACV contains provisions to implement these principles.
Ans: The preamble to the ACV recognizes that, to the
greatest extent possible. the basis of customs value should be the transaction
value. However, in all, it provides for 6 methods of valuation to be applied in
the following order:
1. The Transaction Value Method;
2. Comparative Value Method based on
Transaction Value of Identical goods;
3. Comparative Value Method based on
Transaction Value of Similar goods;
4. Deductive Value Method based on
subsequent sale price in the importing country;
5. Computed Value Method based on cost
of materials, fabrication and profit in the country of production;
and
6. Fallback Method based on previous
methods with greater flexibility.
These methods require to
be applied in the given sequence, starting with the first. Only when a method
specified earlier in the sequence cannot be applied, can resource be taken on
the next method in the sequence.
Ans: Article 4 of the ACV allows an importer to request
reversal of the order of application between the Deductive Value Method and the
Computed Value Method. However, the developing countries are allowed to make a
reservation to the effect that such reversal will be subject to approval by
customs authorities.